Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Japan, Energy Intensity and the Kyoto Protocol

As part of my ongoing posts on Japan (here) I came across an interesting statistic in a paper by Clive Hamilton and Hal Turton on Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries. Over time, the OECD and EU countries have been reducing their energy intensity (TFC/GDP) where TFC is Total Final Consumption of energy and GDP is Gross Domestic Product. Japan has not reduced energy intensity to the same degree (see the graphic above). From the Hamilton and Turton paper:

"Japan has not improved as much as other countries, a result that can be attributed to a combination of events prior to 1982 including economic restructuring that replaced highly energy-intensive industries and pressures from the 1970s oil crisis that led to a highly energy-efficient economy".

Why is Japan as an energy intensity outlier interesting or important? Consider a simple model that underlies a lot of thinking about environmental impacts (e.g., the IPAT equation, the Kaya Identity and the Environmental Kuznets Curve):


Population growth (N above and P in the IPAT equation) under a given level of affluence (A in the IPAT equation and q above) generates output (Q). A given level of technology (T in the IPAT equation and e above) generates a certain level of energy use (E), that is, energy intensity. Energy intensity generates an environmental impact (C for CO2 emissions in this case). The lower the energy intensity, the less the environmental impact.

The fact that Japan has had relatively stable energy intensity for much of the late 20th century and, as a result of the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, might have to phase out its nuclear power plants means that, in the future, we can expect an increase in carbon emissions (one estimate, here, is for a 10% to 37% increase). Japan had planned on using increased nuclear power to reduce CO2 emissions and meet its commitments under the Kyoto Protocol. As a result of the earthquake and tsunami, Japan is unlikely to meet its emission targets.

Western Industrial Throwaway Economy No Longer Viable



The notorious environmentalist, Lester Brown (discussed in a prior post here) thinks that we need an urgent and immediate response, on the scale of World War II, to revamp the Western Economic system (here).

We need an economy for the twenty-first century, one that is in sync with the earth and its natural support systems, not one that is destroying them.The fossil fuel-based, automobile-centered, throwaway economy that evolved in western industrial societies is no longer a viable model—not for the countries that shaped it or for those that are emulating them. In short, we need to build a new economy, one powered with carbon-free sources of energy—wind, solar, and geothermal—one that has a diversified transport system and that reuses and recycles everything. We can change course and move onto a path of sustainable progress, but it will take a massive mobilization—at wartime speed.

It is not likely to happen without a major catastrophe on the order of a world war, but he is offering a Plan B, should it be needed.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

The Cost of Collective Bargaining


Wisconsin Republican Governor Scott Walker describes the amount of cost reduction that will result from eliminating the collective bargaining rights of public workers ($ Saved = 0).

Monday, April 11, 2011

Stack & Tilt: Warning, Skip This Drill

At the end of last season, I didn't finish in a very good place with the Stack & Tile (S&T) swing (here). This season I started playing with my old Width swing to not very good initial results. At the same time, I downloaded Tiger Woods (TW) MySwing app for the iPhone. I have just started experimenting with the app which allows you to record videos of your swing. I've recorded and uploaded an initial down-the-line (DOL) video of my current swing (here) after absorbing some of the TW instruction that comes along with the app. What became clear to me is that one particular instructional tip in the S&T book sent me down the wrong path.

As a drill to encourage tilt, the S&T book suggests hitting balls with the left eye closed (right frame above). You know you've tilted enough if you can still see the ball with your right eye open and your left eye closed. "Keep your eye on the ball" is a figure of speech for most people but for golfers it begs the question of "which eye"? In the Width swing (left frame) it's the left eye that stays on the ball. In the S&T swing, the left eye could still stay on the ball but notice how much smaller the angle is between the eye and the ball (middle frame).

Unfortunately, working on the left-eye drill really got me into the wrong space with my golf swing (left frame above). In the TW MySwing instruction, Tiger suggests keeping the head in front of the orange line (right frame above). As you start the downswing, the head moves toward the target, but never breaks the plane created by the orange line through your right ear (as is evident in the width swing, left frame in the first graphic above). Tiger is staying stacked, but skipping the tilt.

In future posts, I'll review the TW MySwing app and post swing results (here) as I absorb more of the instruction.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Will Japan Recover? Maybe Not!













On CNBC's Fast Money today, John Mauldin described the Japanese economy as "a bug in search of a windshield". In the next 18 - 24 months, Mauldin predicts that the Japanese economy will implode. No one will lend Japan money at reasonable interest rates and the Yen is going "into the tank".

The video above provides a pretty clear statement of the prediction that Japan will not recover. Coupled with my last post (here), hopefully it will be interesting to see what forecasting models might have to say.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Will Japan Recover? Yes, Maybe or No?


On Fareed Zakaria GPS last Sunday, Sony CEO Sir Howard Stringer observed in the video above that Japan's culture of calm in response to devastating crises will not only allow it to recover but also to rebuild, make changes in the economy and re-emerge as a more dynamic country than before the crisis.

Japan was certainly able to dramatically recover from World War II. The Japanese post-war economic miracle, however, was followed by the world oil crisis in 1973, the asset price bubble in 1991 and the "Lost Decade" 1991-2000. Understanding whether Japan will recover from the 2011 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis should depend, to some extent, on an accurate understanding of how Japan responded to prior historical crises.

A lot has been written about Japan in the late 20th century. What is particularly interesting is the bubble-and-collapse history compared to the suggested policy responses. Most of the writers seem to be arguing that some type of policy response would have (counterfactually) prevented or at least diminished the period of collapse after the bubble. However, if the Japanese economy was returning to a dynamic attractor after each bubble, there is really little that could be done to have prevented the return.

The 2011 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis coupled with the atomic destruction of Hiroshima during World War II is a shocking history for any country to endure. Over the next year (or however long it will take), I'd like to try to understand Japan's late 20th century economic history and deepen my connection to the Japanese people. Here's my current reading list which will certainly expand over time:
Other books on my reading list: